John Thune Rejects Trump Plan to Force Filibuster on SAVE Act [hVt0XiGgYlm]
Senate Majority Leader John Thune says the votes are not there to force a talking filibuster on the SAVE Act, rejecting a proposal promoted by Donald Trump. The debate over the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act highlights growing tensions in the Senate over voting legislation and filibuster rules. Senate Majority Leader John Thune stated that the Senate does not have enough votes to pursue a strategy suggested by Donald Trump to pass the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, commonly known as the SAVE Act. Speaking on Tuesday, Thune said the numbers in the chamber do not support either eliminating the filibuster or requiring opponents to hold the Senate floor in a talking filibuster in order to block the legislation. The SAVE Act would require individuals to provide documented proof of citizenship when registering to vote. Trump identified the legislation as his number one priority heading into the midterm elections while addressing Republicans at an issues conference in Doral, Florida. During his remarks, Trump urged lawmakers to advance the bill through the Senate and warned that failure to pass the legislation could create political challenges for Republicans in the upcoming elections. Thune responded by emphasizing the procedural limits within the Senate. He explained that the votes required to change the filibuster rules are not available. According to Thune, both eliminating the filibuster and implementing a talking filibuster requirement would require support that currently does not exist in the chamber. Trump also stated that he hears strong public support for the legislation during his appearances and said voters frequently raise the issue when speaking with him. In his comments, he contrasted the attention given to the SAVE Act with other legislative matters currently being considered by the Senate, including a housing reform bill. The former president also warned that he could refuse to sign most legislation passed by Congress until the Senate approves the SAVE Act. He indicated that an exception could be made for legislation related to funding the Department of Homeland Security. The exchange reflects the ongoing debate in Washington over election legislation, Senate procedures, and the political priorities leading into the midterm elections. As the discussion continues, lawmakers must weigh procedural constraints against political pressure surrounding the bill.