Lindsay Clancy Asked For WHAT From Her Hospital Bed?! [xWGnybicfP9]
After her three children died, Lindsay Clancy was intubated in a hospital bed. She could not speak. She was given an erasable whiteboard. And the first thing she wrote was a question that splits this case down the middle. Her jury is now seated in Plymouth Superior Court. Eighteen people who have to answer one thing nobody agrees on: was a mother on thirteen psychiatric medications criminally responsible? Both sides stipulate that she killed her children. The dispute is whether she was sane when she did it. The prosecution says she checked Apple Maps to calculate how long her husband would be out. She allegedly strangled all three children in the window she created and then jumped from a second-story window. To the Commonwealth, that is a calculated act by a woman who knew exactly what she was doing. But Lindsay Clancy was prescribed thirteen different psychiatric medications in four months. Zoloft. Prozac. Klonopin. Seroquel. Valium. Ambien. Her husband told the doctors she had turned into a zombie. One physician did not know what another was prescribing. She begged for help and the system failed her repeatedly. Patrick Clancy is on both witness lists. The prosecution is calling him first. He has filed a malpractice lawsuit against her doctors, told a reporter he was not married to a monster, and publicly forgave her. Massachusetts law puts the burden on the prosecution to prove she was sane beyond a reasonable doubt. Andrea Yates drowned five children during a postpartum psychotic episode. A Texas jury convicted her. Then a second jury acquitted her. If the first Yates jury got it wrong when the crime was too horrific to sit with, this jury is facing the same impossible facts under an even higher legal standard. Massachusetts requires the prosecution to prove sanity beyond a reasonable doubt. Not the defense proving insanity. The prosecution proving she was sane. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer examines the whiteboard question, the Andrea Yates parallel, the risk in calling Patrick Clancy first, and what this jury has to decide. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. Instagram Facebook Tik-Tok X Twitter This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #PostpartumPsychosis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #JenniferCoffindaffer #PatrickClancy #PlymouthCourt #InsanityDefense #AndreaYates #Duxbury