Lindsay Clancy Murder Trial: Can She Plan a Crime and Still Be Legally Insane? [cYI2FUhy4Mr]
Can someone plan a crime and still be legally insane? As jury selection begins in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial, Court TV anchor Cody Thomas joins criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter to examine the central question surrounding her expected insanity defense. Josh and Cody discuss what Clancy’s alleged planning may mean under Massachusetts law, and whether a not-guilty-by-reason-of-insanity verdict would constitute justice, and much more. Josh also previews the preliminary hearing for D4vd, whose legal name is David Anthony Burke, in the death of Celeste Rivas Hernandez. 0:00 Intro 0:46 Welcome 4:22 Court TV’s Cody Thomas joins 5:46 Why the Lindsay Clancy case is so divisive 8:48 Jury selection begins 12:15 Can planning coexist with legal insanity? 19:21 Does the suicide attempt strengthen her defense? 30:10 Could Patrick Clancy’s support influence jurors? 39:45 Would an NGI verdict be justice? 44:26 Cody’s final thoughts 45:37 Why the jury’s view of the window matters 47:15 Massachusetts insanity law and what NGI means 51:30 d4vd preliminary hearing preview 60:58 Announcements and upcoming coverage 1:10:35 Outro Where to find Cody Thomas: Follow Josh: Merch: Support our moderators: DISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video. FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #d4vd #CelesteRivasHernandez #CourtroomConfidential #TrueCrime #LegalAnalysis